Obama taught constitutional law, and is against the SC ruling?

He cites his emotional rationale, that corporations will more effectively control the election process. What about his constitutional rationale? What do you think Obama thinks about this ruling in terms of the constitution?

I agree w/ Obama’s feelings and the SC’s decision, despite that both reach different conclusions, because from the perspective of how they lay out their arguments, I feel both are right. The SC wins, because the constitution is the law of the land, but this victory of the constitution seems sour.

It sure does seem sour. It would have been one thing if they had put a cap on expenditures similar to those of individuals ($2500). But in all actuality, a corporation (or union) really doesn’t have a voice… or a hand to cast a ballot. They should find a way to make sure that 100% of all corp/union members agree with ad before it is legally allowed to air, since they are being represented by said corp/union. But something is missing here…
______________________________
"Who better than corporations to get things done and why shouldn’t they have political power?"

– I at least have the opportunity to vote for my representatives (even if it doesn’t go my way). I have no vote with other organizations. Plus I don’t have time to sit around creating a list of what companies I want to support/not support (simply because of politics). Their job is to produce something and make adjustments as needed, according to the laws, in order to make a profit. I see this as giving them too much influence in creating laws that benefit them.